Also now question for the bitbrawlers team , is there anyway you can provide evidence that he placed the separate bet for a game that has already started ? For example if there's a timestamp of the 2 bets , showing that one of them was after the game started ?
The only evidence we have is that bets have been altered after the betting period has closed unfortunately. It seems like during the execution of the vulnerability, the original bet timestamp is overridden. I will however ask our security staff to double check to see if any other evidence can be gleaned.
Here's why I think bitbrawlers was right ! First of all , there are other players who have turned 0.005 btc for example into 0.1 btc and had no problem withdrawing . I myself turned 0.03 btc into 0.2 btc , ( this was from their bonus ) . But my greed got the better of me and I busted it all . Anyway , also what is a clear red flag for me , is the fact , that the player wanted to settle for 0.2 btc instead of the 0.4 btc . Why on earth would you offer to take only 50 % of the amount , when you know that your bets were legitimate ??
I mean , I know how I would react , if I earned 0.4 btc legitimatly , I wouldn't accept even 1 satoshi less , as I won the money fair . So lets say it's a bit strange for me why he's so willing to give up so fast 0.2 btc , would any of you do it ?
Indeed. Heres the proposal donsifon sent to us:

Does this not read like an extortion letter? Why would someone who isnt a cheater want to settle for 50% like that? Isnt that something only a cheater would do after theyre caught?
He also sent us a threatening message telling us he will destroy our search engine ranking if we dont let him withdraw any amount that he wants:
