Quote from: iasenko on February 18, 2020, 08:24:59 AM

Isn't it a bit better now at least in the Bitcoin section?

Agree, when everyone cares about the activities of spammers on various boards in the forum, the forum will look healthier. But I think if we have to talk about it continuously without action, the results will not change at all.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on February 18, 2020, 08:55:13 AM

Disagree. The trust system shouldn't be used to tag spammers.

I understand what you mean, but when I am active as a bounty hunter, not many managers will accept participants with negative trust and that is what I think. Negative trust with the tag "spammer and will change to neutral if proven to change" I think will help the forum to reduce the number of spam posts on various boards.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on February 18, 2020, 08:55:13 AM

Spamming is against the rules, and these users should have their posts deleted or accounts banned. Being a spammer doesn't inherently make one untrustworthy.

The negative tag with the comment "spammer and will return to neutral if the user is proven to change" I think does not automatically make that user untrustworthy. This tag is only to make them deterrent so they want to change their bad habits into members of a good community.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on February 18, 2020, 08:55:13 AM

I would encourage everyone who frequents these boards to report spam posts rather than just skipping over them.

This is a good solution and must be done by everyone, and so far the action must continue to be socialized to all forum members who want to contribute. Keeping forums clean from spam posts is an obligation of all forum members, ignoring them will not help the forum because they will continue to post and post endlessly without our knowledge. Banned is the last solution for spammers who dont want to change and I will support this forum and the good of all members.