Quote from: wwzsocki on February 18, 2020, 05:45:26 PM

As I said I only asked for advice as I did already before because I was already writing much, but could easily spread this to many more boards. I truly don't know what is hard here to understand?

I will not quote these posts one more time here to not make this answer "long-winded" again, but you can easily find them back in Chipmexer thread and read one more time with little more understanding and would be great if your fillings would be neutral if you will do this and not against me as always, maybe this will open your eyes wider sometimes.

Would you post the way you post if you didn't carry a signature and/or didn't want to apply for the Chipmixer campaign? Based on this:

Quote from: wwzsocki on January 25, 2020, 10:40:22 PM

I am little surprised to see such a laconic answer because I was fully honest (as always) and think that without the information I asked for would be really hard to figure out needs of this campaign, to be able to change/improve ourselves on time, especially for good writers from saturated, small local boards.

Additionally, I followed your last suggestion and started to write across more boards, especially Gambling and Gambling discussion, but seems like it has no impact on the final recruitment decisions at this time at least (to my surprise) and we already know that there is need for Chipmixer signature in these boards.

... and on some of your other comments - the answer seems to be "no". I think that's the wrong approach. Posting for the "needs" of a campaign is wrong.