Quote from: Spendulus on February 18, 2020, 03:15:29 AM

If I'm missing a point, it's because you are now spewing them in about eighteen different directions. This whole thing is very simple.

Oh, man. At this point I feel like you're just picking faults at everything I said.

I openly stated: "And in honesty that piece serves no purpose, so let's just scratch it and leave it as misargumentation of my part."

Yes, I realize I wasn't able to express myself clearly. Can we move rather than beating this dead dog?

Quote from: Spendulus on February 18, 2020, 03:15:29 AM

It doesn't matter if you got the point. You were wrong. You said "people misuse the geological time scale and large-0period climatic oscillations to justify beliefs for a short-term climatic oscillation."

In regards to that, it's mostly anecdotal. As far as my research pointed, hardly any larger press wouldn't use that type of misinterpretation. But if I ever get into a global warming skepticism group in Facebook I'll be sure to printscreen you the images.

In fact, what larger presses DO use as a global cooling "argument" is the idea that sun activity is paramount to Earth's climate and thus if sun activity increases global warming happens and if it decreases global cooling happens. Which I have pointed out a few posts behind is not scientifically accurate.

Quote

You're right, solar activity is dwindling. But that has happened for over 35 years already, and for over 35 years temperature's been rising, therefore, the highs we experienced are not directly caused by the sun.

Here's an image that pictures that: Picture.
(Sources are NASA GISS, Krivova et al. (2007) and PMOD).

Maybe in the past the sun was more significant, but studies have pointed out this has changed. Here's another picture: Picture. The sources for this study are: Meehl et al. (2004), Stone et al. (2007), Lean & Rind (2008) and Huber & Knutti (2011).

There are, at the very least, 19 studies that point how the sun's influence in global warming is minimal. You can check them here.

Also, what's your scientific and falseable source that global cooling is a thing? Because quite a lot of studies converge into the idea there is none.

If you don't agree with the notion that sun activity is directly causing global cooling, then I guess we're done.