at this point, a "scam buster" need only make an unproven or arbitrary accusation, point to the accusation in a trust page reference, and get a few of his buddies to agree---that's the standard for red trust now. proof of wrongdoing is never a requirement.
This has always been the case. You quoted and re-quoted the word "proactive" -- this means taking action
before people have actually been scammed. As such, you can't have "proof" of an event that hasn't yet happened.
Tags and Level 1 flags are good for this sort of thing. You and TS don't have to approve of it, but you are in the vast minority here.
I think people like you depend on convincing people like us we are in the minority, because the fact is YOU are in the vast minority.
Seems like its an appropriate time to share one of your favorite memes.

The only difference is your minority props each other up to enable this abuse while the majority is intimidated into staying silent.
Its easy to claim you are speaking for the silent masses when nobody knows what they are actually thinking, which is just as hard to disprove as it is to prove. Regardless, when I say you are in the minority, I mean DT-wise. This is an objective reality. Don't believe it? Take a look at your overall DT score.
If it wasn't true all of you Bozonians wouldn't be trying so desperately hard to convince us otherwise and trying to silence us with retaliation for speaking about it.
Obviously nobody's trying to silence you. Either speak, or don't; frankly I don't think many people give a shit.
The only places with preemptive policing are totalitarian governments where individuals have little to no freedoms. This isn't something we should be emulating no matter how much you jerk yourself off about how great you are and convince yourself you are stopping so many scams. You aren't stopping shit and this behavior is self serving.
Thanks for another sanctimonious lecture driven by nothing but your inability to restrain your personal feelings.