Quote from: nutildah on February 21, 2020, 05:39:16 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 21, 2020, 04:05:01 PM

Since the beginning of February we changed the logic a little bit so the "badges" now show the status as of the time of the event (i.e. you can see how the particular inclusion/exclusion affects the target user). It also "froze" old data so The Pharmacist's "badge" on that old record remains DT2 even though he's now DT1.

I have a plan to fix the historic data so that it makes more sense but that's a low priority, because that log is useful mostly in the current week before LoyceV's lists get updated.

Oh, OK, that makes sense, thanks.

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

Quote from: nutildah on February 21, 2020, 07:49:25 AM

Now of course TS and perhaps others are going to say that I like it as is because it "favors" me, but I'd like to think it only does so because my use of the system remains within the general bounds of what is considered to be acceptable.

It clearly does favor you. You were openly selling your account.

[img width=300]https://colombiareports.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/sex.jpg[/img]

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

For all we know you aren't actually Nutilduhh, and you have no way to prove the trade never happened.

Okay, by that logic prove you never sold your account. Most account sales take place off forum so there's no record of it here. I heard it was sold. Prove it wasn't.

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

If it were me or anyone else the clown car has on their shit list, this would be the worst atrocity ever committed. You have tagged people for exactly the same.

I tagged one full-time account seller, once. That was their business on the forum. They did nothing other than that.

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

People have been excluded from the DT for doing nothing more than what you did here.

There's a big difference between me and Bill Gator in that this isn't a bought account. You have no proof that it was sold (objective standards, remember?), not that I agree that Bill Gator should have been tagged to shreds.

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

Since you make a habit of being on your knees and washing the balls of the DT members, you get a pass. This system absolutely does favor you.

If I left a bunch of bullshit ratings, used my inclusions and exclusions to pad my trust or DT score, or included scammers in my trust list - thereby failing to demonstrate that I had an understanding of the DT system over a period of years - then I would absolutely be punished for it. You have no proof otherwise except for what you have imagined via your own projections.

I never advertised my account for sale. You did. I am very sorry you made such a stupid mistake exposing your willingness to allow this forum to be defrauded for a few hundred dollars, and then furthermore run around punishing people for exactly what you yourself were guilty of, but that is not my responsibility.

You posted your account for sale, proving factually in your own words your intent to allow the forum to be defrauded for a few hundred dollars. You then tried to cover it up by editing the post, also demonstrating you know you did something you shouldn't have. You have no way to prove your account wasn't sold, and this is significant evidence to suggest it was regardless of your protestations and refractory counter demands.

This would have been more than enough evidence to destroy anyone on the DT shitlist, but you get a pass because you are a full time ball washer of everyone who would be excluding you. You are a walking talking living example of trust system nepotism and selective enforcement allowing abuse.

Quote from: suchmoon on February 21, 2020, 05:24:14 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 21, 2020, 04:47:36 PM

~

So the good news seems to be that in ~5 years the clowns will be able to apply to the guild regardless of what they did in the past.

Could be less, maybe like 3 days actually, seeing how a member of the guild left non-standard feedback as recently as February 17, 2020.

Thanks for more proof of your intellectual dishonesty. No argument for your obsessive muck raking in a desperate search to find any morsel to impugn my character over, being forced to go back years to find examples, you are now resorting to defining people I didn't even put in the suggested inclusions list as "guild members". I guess that is the kind of thing you think qualifies for logic. You define what the guild is, then condemn me for what you defined it as. That doesn't sound anything at all like a straw man argument now does it?

The people you have in your inclusions I don't even have to go back months, I only need look back days and weeks. Shit some of your inclusions probably have abused the trust system within hours. Lets not focus on that though, you have proof I once ate a Payday bar back in 2014.