Quote from: marlboroza on February 22, 2020, 09:07:15 PM

Quote from: truth or dare on February 22, 2020, 08:36:36 PM

You didn't answer my question that I asked you and then again pointed out later that you seem to be avoiding it?

Not really. You asked me "do I support moving entirely over to a flagging system"? No, I don't. There are too many tagged scammers to support this. Moving system to flags only would wipe all trust records and I don't think anyone will bother to flag each one of them. Or do you have something different in mind?

What about positive trust? How would you handle this? What about neutral feedback?

Quote from: truth or dare on February 22, 2020, 08:54:02 PM

Tecshare has shown willing to adapt to in information produced so the lists are clearly dynamic.

Lol, where?

okay, you raise some valid questions that do need some further thought to provide the optimal solution.

all "feedback" could either be positive or neutral? if a person deserves a negative that would at a minimum be a type1 flag. There could be further objective standards for positive feedback at another stage to prevent trust farming or unwarranted accumulation? another bonus of objective standards.

that could be open to community debate and discussion
nothing need be set in stone at this stage, this is the formative stage. Forming a union of those with a desire for the implementation of optimal system is the first stage.

Well, he removed that member that suchmoon raised concerns over right? so he is demonstrating he is working hard to take in all relevant feedback.

So you would like to move to a transparent objective standards based system that ensures the equal, fair and consistent treatment of all members you just want the process to be clear and established before getting on board? or is that not what you are saying?

I will be considering all of this over the weekend. I am certain tecshare has the best interests of the entire forum at heart. I am not hijacking this thread for my own desires. I am merely voicing suggestions that should be scrutinized and evaluated. Nobody arrives at the optimal solution immediately, sensible and reasonable criticism is key to the process.

If tecshare requests I reserve my " suggestions" for my own thread I will consider that for sure. I will support this guild regardless.

Freedom of speech is the most valuable privilege here, theymos has done an amazing job for many years. I may seem ungrateful l, but I'm not. It's just that I believe his
experiment with decentralized governance was a failure in comparison to his own centralized approach to things. Sorry about that. It would be unrealistic to think one person could immediately create the optimal decentralized governance structure on an anonymous forum. Perhaps patience is not my strong suit.