Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Flat Earth
by
odolvlobo
on 24/02/2020, 09:02:47 UTC
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation

...
The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether.

I figured that Le Sage's theory might appeal to you because it describes something that is similar to buoyancy. Note that the theory does not depend on the existence of planets or space or relativity or aether.

My problem with your Coulomb force explanation (as I understand it) is that it requires an aether that has mass and charge. In addition, aether must be extremely rigid in order to transmit electromagnetic waves at high frequencies, but you write that it is a "super-fine gas", which is anything but rigid.