Quote from: TemTum on February 25, 2020, 03:27:16 AM

Quote from: BubbleButtBabe on February 25, 2020, 03:21:10 AM

The fastest most tps = most centralized. This is a problem that they can only prentend to solve. The only real possible improvement over btc is variable blocksize. This does not account for dag or nano type designs

This is a very naive statement - some blockchains actually get faster the more its decentralised as they can use the latency of other nodes and delegation and sharding to Increase TPS

But do they also not open themselves to new attack vectors and become less secure?
What about Ada and rchain offer?

Okay which single design offers improvements over bitcoin in all areas without giving up or creating new issues either attack vectors etc?
I have been reading what I can but i am not trained in deep analysis of these designs

Is there a clear design that has more advantages than disadvantages over bitcoin?

So many people and PhDs claiming their design is superior until competitors claim there is blatant weaknesses

If there really is a completed working tested proven design that is faster , more secure, equally decentralized that bitcoin ?which is it and is there wide consensus from peer reviews and reliable sources?

Seems impossible for ordinary members without years of training to correctly assess new designs.

The highest level math and coder I know at my college personally who originally was excited for dag or delegated pos, nano
Now returned and changed his mind to saying simple pos3 design could be the best balance all things considered with some small tweaks to ensure most robust and capable and reliable nodes.

He is now looking at what he called accounts based design but I lost the rest of his message to understand what project this is. It might be blacknet. Since he was looking at that I know. Or it could be something else entirely. That dev was first to upgrade original pos.

As you say perhaps I should have put my post as a question not statement.