Quote from: TECSHARE on February 26, 2020, 02:05:52 PM

Quote from: allahabadi on February 26, 2020, 01:23:22 PM

@TECSHARE and @hacker1001101001
Thanks for the concern, although I am very much in favour of objective standards, but I guess it wud derail the topic at hand.

Quote from: Side chain on February 26, 2020, 11:56:04 AM

-
You are to be blamed too! I am sure Lauda is not in your trust list now? When everyone of you will have this end then you will realize who to add and who not to add in your trust list.
-

It wud hv been better had u commented from your main account. Obviously you are scared or have some sinister motive, also I had a curated trust list prior to being red trusted, so it's not like Lauda isn't in my Trust List NOW.

P.S. Shud I be surprised at the wariness shown by other DTs to not infuriate the so very VINDICTIVE Abuser Huh

One would assume you would be for objective standards for leaving negative ratings given your current circumstance, but apparently not.

I don't want to derail the current topic; but now since you have questioned me on this topic; let me make my stand clear. No human can claim to be objective, value-neutrality is an illusion and I very much agree with Paul Feyerabend (Epistemological Anarchism) and Max Weber on this issue. So to claim that rules devised will be objective would be a misnomer IMO, because to have objective assessments we need to use our subjective faculties.

To claim that my current situation should push me to join any such venture would again be an opportunist assumption; I would have gladly partaken in such a venture even if I wasn't red trusted; had I believed that such a step will lead to objectivity.

I have always been clear with my intentions on this forum; even if the current situation continues to be so and none other deem it worthwhile to respond on this situation, I would still not be willing to claim objectivity.

Even in my posts here I have maintained a sense of subjectivity and to compensate have given them the benefit of doubt within my margin of error (now see even that's subjective).

P.S. I do respect you for trying to start something better; but let's not turn vindictive for the sake of countering vindictiveness.

EDIT:

Quote from: unibitcoinist on February 26, 2020, 02:26:02 PM

-
Some DT members behave such a way that it seems they feel satisfaction red painting an account. It's better to raise voice under an alt account.

Then it is the collective failure of BTCTalk DT members that they continue to accommodate Trust system Abusers within their ranks and if theymos has acknowledged the failure of the system implicitly, then it is better to do away with it altogether.