Quote from: nutildah on February 27, 2020, 03:35:18 AM

Clown music

There is a difference between using the fact that Theymos excluded me 5 years ago to justify other negative ratings (makes no sense), and the fact that Theymos gave a specific directive on how the trust system should be used.

Quote from: suchmoon on February 27, 2020, 03:54:35 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 27, 2020, 03:29:37 AM

Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not?

No and no. Stop using theymos as a crutch when it suits you. He also said "it'd be best to forgive".

Until you, Og, and Vod start seriously working towards deescalation I can't be bothered to care about it anymore. Five minutes of being adults is all it takes. Look at Lauda+Quicksy = ♡. You can do it too, I believe in you, don't let me down.

That rating I left for Vod was the FIRST AND ONLY negative rating I have EVER left for him. You know how many times he left me false and abusive negative ratings and was forced to remove them years before that? At least 3 times, as many as 5. So you are suggesting that doxing a forum member and reporting him to the IRS because of an interpersonal conflict should be excused? Usually that is an instant ban let alone grounds for a negative rating, but Vod never has to follow any rules now does he? Rules are only for people like me. He is free to tag thousands of people for whatever he likes, but he is still free to break all the rules and still be above reproach.

Of course you can't be bothered now that I asked you explicitly. Lets try again.

Is not my rating for Vod valid? Are Vod's negative ratings for me not invalid? Convenient you suddenly can't be bothered when a direct question is asked.

Quote from: Lauda on February 27, 2020, 04:49:34 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 26, 2020, 12:05:46 PM

Lauda 2020-02-26 Reference "Dishonest. Hypocritical. Malicious. Shows no remorse for any misdeeds. This rating has nothing to do with anybody's opinions. Consistent deceptive behavior. See reference links for summary."

I heard this community removed people from the default trust when it is abused to silence others and it is used as a retaliatory tool. So when exactly is that going to happen? I guess as long as you say "This rating has nothing to do with anyboy's opinions" you can leave ratings for peoples opinions and it makes it ok. How much longer is this community going to tolerate being ripped apart by people like this? Until its gone?

FYI, this is the 6th time Lauda has removed and replaced a negative rating for me to manipulate the trust system to make sure it is the first thing anyone sees when they view my trust history.

If your actions create more references and behavior that I must document, then I will indeed do this however many times I need to. Unless of course you prefer the alternative: Having 6 (at the time being) individual negatives from me and more if you create reasons for newer ratings. I think a single new rating is always better, but I am willing to let you choose which way you want it out of kindness. Let me know.

Quote from: suchmoon on February 27, 2020, 03:54:35 AM

Until you, Og, and Vod start seriously working towards deescalation I can't be bothered to care about it anymore. Five minutes of being adults is all it takes. Look at Lauda+Quicksy = ♡. You can do it too, I believe in you, don't let me down.

Stupid life is, is it not? Not being able to show any remorse is a major character flaw.. Undecided

Remorse for what exactly? What did I do wrong. Be specific.