Quote from: suchmoon on March 04, 2020, 12:10:53 PM

Quote from: Lauda on March 04, 2020, 07:16:32 AM

I am dumping the whole PM conversation with madnessteat.

Classy.

This is due to your policy "No public evidence, can not do anything" on one hand, and me not tolerating abuse on the other hand. You reap what you sow. I have even omitted any information that may be harmful to the user and is irrelevant. He/she/it is welcome.

Quote

Thule   2020-03-04   Reference   Published PM without consent.
Known scammer and abuser .
I would not trust him a single Cent.
Big part of community got their BCH stolen by him as escrow
peloso   2020-03-04   Reference   Publication of personal messages without consent.
kzv   2020-03-04   Reference   Publication of personal messages without consent. User cannot be trusted
peloso   2020-03-03   Reference   Created a pseudo-religious cult to manipulate default trust list
Balthazar   2020-03-03   Reference   Archive reference for previous feedback
Balthazar   2020-03-03   Reference   Created a pseudo-religious cult to manipulate default trust list. If I remember correctly, this user was claiming that such activities are untrustworthy (see peloso user profile for details).

It also provided you with evidence of this collusion, so have at it.

Quote from: ChuckBuck on March 04, 2020, 01:53:18 PM

Quote

I also put you a tilde on my trust list.

I felt it was necessary to warn you.

Someone please tell me the meaning of this saying Huh

Is this a threatening way to manipulate trust? Or am I misunderstanding what it means? If you do not remove me from your exclusion list, I will put you on my exclusion list. In this way, it is like an act of retaliation Cheesy

LOL

I used to send a message to a user asking him why he exclude me, but it just stopped there, there shouldn't be any revenge.
We have the same hats, but we don't have the same thoughts, it's a pity Embarrassed

I will translate it (this is what happened):
Step 1: User A: You have me excluded, can you look into it?
Step 2: User B: I will look into it - I have looked into it - Questions some inclusions/exclusions or sent ratings (depending on what is problematic). Keep in mind that this review is solely because User A asked.
Step 3: User A: I have excluded you.

This is what would have happened if I had acted differently:
Step 1: User A: You have me excluded, can you look into it?
Step 2: User B: I have removed your exclusion.
Step 3: User A: Thanks (and possibly "I have included you" - and the cycle begins).