Quote from: asche on March 11, 2020, 03:28:43 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on March 11, 2020, 03:15:44 PM

Might be worth keeping the thread open just a little bit longer to allow those in the campaign who oppose your suggestion to put their case forward. Might be interesting to hear why they need even more money.

Why so judgmental? And why does the amount even matter?

I mean you wear a signature too. Is the amount really relevant? Be it 100 sats or 1cBTC, the principle is the same to some. For someone not using their avatar, and being offered to wear another one for a payment, what would be any valid reason not to do it, besides not liking what the avatar is advertising?

In my case for instance I don't NEED the money from my signature. Most people don't I reckon. Most people live comfortably without that extra income. So why do they still do it?

Question applies to you too

I'm not being "so judgemental" time to zip that fly up.

To answer your question, here is my reasoning which I just posted in another thread:

Quote from: Timelord2067 on March 11, 2020, 03:39:22 PM

In the last month I've started wearing signatures - the funds I've received so far I'm splitting and putting aside for future long term projects.

In theory a portion (25%) to a retirement fund (not my only source of retirement mind you), (25%) fund lightning network channels (more the merrier I guess) and one or two other projects once I work out what they are. (possibly 50/50 split of the remainder to buy alt crypto (25% overall) and buy items (final 25%) such as gems from roughswap in this thread: Swapping gemstones for coins)

The OP was talking about adding an avatar. In this now locked thread I advertise I will rent my Avatar under the following circumstances:

Quote

✅ Campaign or Sig+Avatar package

I'm not inclined to rent out *just* my avatar, hence my taking the OP's side.