Quote from: AmoreJaz on March 11, 2020, 10:28:43 PM

Quote from: tmfp on March 11, 2020, 10:23:06 PM

Quote from: nikacoin_main on March 11, 2020, 08:22:23 AM

Yes, obviously. These are for etherscan then they're removed.

Quote from: Etherscan listng criteria

Visible website, about us, team page, company mailing address, official support channels like reddit, twitter, slack, facebook.

Are Etherscan ok with fake information?

Quote from: nikacoin_main on March 11, 2020, 09:51:55 PM

You're definitely one of those people that sold early and is now upset.

From the look of your chart, selling early was a very good idea.

if a project is using fake photos, then id say they dont want to be traced if something goes wrong in the very near future. even if they are not asking for any amount of money here, the problem is - for those people that who will buy their crap token. they cant run after them because they have no real faces. oh well, users should know better.

It seems like you're used to 2017 and probably were dumb enough to buy into scams. How can this be scammed? Everything is disclosed in the white paper including the zero days, all the information is out there . We don't want to go public because it's a privacy token and certain entities don't like that.

Maybe if you added 2 + 2 together, you wouldn't be fudding a project that has not made any money for the devs, that has started out free and already broken a few icebergs in less than a week.