Quote from: Sterbens on March 15, 2020, 01:04:39 PM

Quote from: Shef198911 on March 15, 2020, 10:56:48 AM

Quote from: Jawhead999 on March 15, 2020, 03:29:09 AM

Have you read the reference before?

When you find the plagiarism content, you should check the reference first to make sure this white paper is plagiarism or only using reference from other site/content.

I think it's not plagiarized since they're using as a reference, so it will avoid plagiarism

Quote

What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is using someone's writing and ideas without acknowledgement.

As plagiarism may be penalised by the Open Polytechnic, it's important that you avoid plagiarising. You can avoid plagiarising if you reference your work correctly.

Quote

https://i.imgur.com/3Qz7IwW.png https://i.imgur.com/esa1O0J.png

https://i.ibb.co/HgGCQdq/Screenshot-227.png

Quote

https://i.imgur.com/uQhlyYS.png https://i.imgur.com/0DpgdOE.png

Disclaimer is not content about the project, you can't show this as a proof of plagiarized white paper. You will saw another tons project have a same disclaimer.

Quote

https://i.imgur.com/WwCteMT.png

https://i.ibb.co/ZY9YhNJ/Screenshot-228.png

I am not a part or team of Ispolink project. But, it's not enough proof to say this is the scam project.

If you have more proof, you can post it

is not plagiarized? some material is taken from someone else's whitepaper and not one word, but paragraphs

Means that if some material is taken from several projects means Isopolink does not have a good idea in their project so they take the word from several projects to include it.
I am still not sure about this Isopolink project because my product is not very clear in my opinion.

I disagree with you. This is poor attempt to create FUD and discredit the project. First of all, the similarity of the content is below 10% on average which is rather low and proves the opposite -it's not plagiriazed. It's normal to have similarities, because clearly there has been a through research made, you can't simply make the data up. In addition, the only part that has been take is the definition of Matic and it's features, and also in the references section they have included the source, I don't see any issue with that.Unless you expect to make up new definition of other projects? In order to categorize the whitepaper as plagiarized, it should have 50% or more similarity, word by word the , copy pasting. Clearly this is not the case here. Why don't you analyze other whitepapers too, how about Tron's whitepaper?

I've read through it and it seems a well grounded and justified project.