Re: Another Lauda topic : Can we review the feedback she lefts?
| snip | What is the point of this thread? Are you an alt of Lauda, or of Cryptohunter / TOAA / Thule / (insert lame name here). |
Anyway, actmyname and LoyceV already gave some fine response here. These days were gone when we used to wait for someone to be on DT and then starts talking about their feedback ratings especially from the users who received the reds. The new dynamic DT system allows anyone to be on the DT with just one inclusion by a DT1 and every month we are seeing DT1 users are rotating randomly.
Lauda's feedback really needs some attention since she still has a lot of people who have her in their trust lists (Both entrust and distrust). And I have this feeling that most of the inclusion and exclusions are based on her past good time and long term users in the forum. Some people think, including Lauda in their trust system will save the forum from the scammers who she tagged.
Quote
| snip | Most if not all of Lauda's negatives are in breach of @theymos' directives concerning retaliatory trust feedback and at the moment he is /]once again removed from DT2 so his negatives are (quite rightly) meaningless. |