Quote from: Timelord2067 on March 13, 2020, 08:35:01 AM

snip	What is the point of this thread? Are you an alt of Lauda, or of Cryptohunter / TOAA / Thule / (insert lame name here).

You are all wrong in your guesses. Did you miss some more? Grin

Anyway, actmyname and LoyceV already gave some fine response here. These days were gone when we used to wait for someone to be on DT and then starts talking about their feedback ratings especially from the users who received the reds. The new dynamic DT system allows anyone to be on the DT with just one inclusion by a DT1 and every month we are seeing DT1 users are rotating randomly.

Lauda's feedback really needs some attention since she still has a lot of people who have her in their trust lists (Both entrust and distrust). And I have this feeling that most of the inclusion and exclusions are based on her past good time and long term users in the forum. Some people think, including Lauda in their trust system will save the forum from the scammers who she tagged.

Quote

snip	Most if not all of Lauda's negatives are in breach of @theymos' directives concerning retaliatory trust feedback and at the moment he is /]once again removed from DT2 so his negatives are (quite rightly) meaningless.

She seems to have her own theory when she leaves the feedback. Now should we all have different theories to tag the people who we do not like? This is going to create a mess.