Quote from: bitserve on March 22, 2020, 06:29:04 PM

Quote from: Biodom on March 22, 2020, 06:25:02 PM

Quote from: Elwar on March 22, 2020, 06:16:17 PM

Quote from: lightfoot on March 22, 2020, 05:49:03 PM

A temporary tattoo can identify the certifiably fine, and they can spend unemployment doing things that will help. Pay them from the Govt and you have a serious solution to this mess.

Tattoo with the person's SS number and maybe sew a symbol on peoples' clothes. Like a big star to show people that you're a shining star in the darkness.

Completely inappropriate comparison, IMHO.
Intent matters in this case as long as it positive (enabling) and not negative (restricting).
Personally, I would like to know if i had it or not.
If I had it, then behavior and options available should change, apart from having less stress.
Now, the word is going around that it originally started in September and a few people who had nasty "flu" in late 2019 might have had CV instead.

See? So you are saying if you KNEW you are already inmune you would change your behaviour, relax your profilactic measures, and think yourself entitled to don't follow the restrictions, right?

Well, that's why it would be wrong to do that. Yet.

Not really...What i am saying that if someone knew their antibody status then they CAN take a bit more appropriate risk, like going to a grocery shop without much fear of being infected by a sneezing lady/guy nearby. Some can even volunteer for civic services. I am totally not saying that having antibodies would make you a superman partying day and night.

Having more information is almost always better. Regarding timing, I agree that maybe it is not the time, but only because the number of antibody-positive is probably low, although without testing we don't even know if it is a fact.