Quote from: sxemini on March 24, 2020, 02:07:01 PM

Quote from: JayDDee on March 24, 2020, 12:50:09 PM

Quote from: [RWTeam] on March 24, 2020, 12:25:08 PM

Zero fee is bad for developers , they should get money for their job. But some of them become to greedy so we have to reduce devfee.

We have no point in doing something bad , we clearly say what was changed in software and how it will profit miners and us. As we already said to other guy here , this topic was here for 1.5 years before greedy claymore deleted it and the topic had 18k views and zero complains. Many smart miners use our 0.5% devfee releases for almost 2 years now.

If what you say is true you can expect to be deleted again, it only takes one legitimate complaint.
Where are your date stamped previous versions? And about those smart miners, where are they?
Someone who downloads and unknown binary packaged as a miner posted by a newbie user
from mega is not someone I would call smart.

It is not the first version from RWTeam. I can assure you that it is not a virus.

Thanks man

Quote

But i am with you, the best solution would be no fee like this
https://github.com/d33z0r-reloaded/Claymore-Ethereum-Miner-v15.0-NoFee-DevFee-Removed

At first look this guy is using "reloaded" tag and we think that famous scene group would be able to disable devfee way more elegant than changing claymore's devfee addresses to user address. Usually when this kind of "no devfee" method used it means that author of "devfee-remover" can't properly disable devfee and most likely put his own address instead of user address , so that 0% devfee turns into full 1% but to author of "devfee-remover". We are not claiming anything right now and will check this later.