Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 02:12:12 PM

Quote from: Vispilio on Today at 12:01:40 PM

Ignorance is never a solution to anything, please don't try to derail this thread with extremely bad advice. Your nepotist position of trying to routinely cover up for the Reputation and DT trolls of this forum is noted and rejected.

I'm not sure what you're talking about, but it's kinda sad and funny at the same time that your Trust in my judgement is gone the moment I post something you don't like.

No, it's been gone long ago, your latest response just reminded me of how deep the DT corruption runs on this forum, that

and your manipulative threads like this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235038.msg54086561#msg54086561
where you try to gently impose Red China style group-think on Bitcointalk members...

For further reference, and fair warning to all BTT members, please don't let an ocean of minor statistical forum tools obsessively prepared by @LoyceV delude you into lending him an air of false credibility; he often uses them to attempt various tactics of oppression in the forum to benefit his own DT clique:

Quote from: Vispilio on March 26, 2020, 08:15:16 AM

I believe threads like this have helped turn the Default Trust experiment into a complete failure.

Admin should now understand that even some of the most experienced "veteran" members of this forum are not ready for a decentralized diverse form of meritocracy, and prefer a Red China style singular echo chamber instead where opinions deviating from the mainstream are quickly silenced and excluded, no matter how substantial or valuable they may be:

Quote from: LoyceV on March 24, 2020, 09:44:02 AM

Note that there are usually several possibilities to improve the situation

The user with negative feedback should be excluded
The user(s) who left the negative feedback should be excluded

Number 1 & 2 have already been happening for years, that's why there is at least 20 threads in Reputation with the tag "Trust Abuse"...

The whole point of having 100+ DT members is to have a plurality of cultures and ideologies gaining representation in a forum that attempts to be libertarian in ideology, and it's the sign of a natural and free world that some of these members disagree with or even dislike each other.

Hundreds of very valuable and intelligent members have spoken up against bad practices by some deeply entrenched default trust members; if you try to motivate people into excluding them so that your precious friends can keep their trust sheets artificially clean, you are effectively devaluing the entire trust system of BTT, and that's why most people have stopped paying any attention to trust ratings because they understand in the vast majority of cases they are more based on political favoritism than justice or meritocracy.

I strongly urge future Bounty Campaigns to take a note of "safe echo-chamber formation" threads like this and stop giving a rat's ass about trust ratings on this forum, the Trust System has no meaningful purpose except for maybe warning the greenest of rookies about the most obvious of scams...