Quote from: CETAN.IO on April 07, 2020, 01:01:58 PM

Quote from: bits4books on April 07, 2020, 07:16:52 AM

First, crypto-users are against KYC, registrations, and any encroachment on anonymity and reduced centralization
And then create a wallet with the ability to transfer money via a phone number
April 1 has already passed, TS

Quote from: mlmdaily on April 07, 2020, 06:46:07 AM

Crypto should be anonymous at least a bit. I against phone numbers transaction even with fiat

Crypto community for a normal developing crypto economy, if KYC contributes to this development, then for God's sake, now there are many zones in the world where KYC is required for the sake of the Protocol, but this data is not sent anywhere except to one Bank. Our company issues non-registered cards that allow users to protect themselves as much as possible from additional costs.
As for April 1) well, this technology has already been tested and is used in classic banks! We took it for our own use because it reduces the risk of making a mistake with the address, it helps to interact with your colleagues who do not use the crypt because of the difficulty in using it.

I am not against such applications and translation methods. It's convenient and cool, I'm not arguing.
But a lot of people from the community will start building theories that your app is a project of the FBI to deanonymize crypto-users.
The project itself is nice, but possible claims are not very good.