Quote from: Foxpup on Today at 02:30:05 PM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on Today at 01:57:11 PM

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on Today at 04:39:30 AM

Are you saying now lauda is trans?

I don't know what Foxxy was saying,

I was just calling out c******unter's blatant transphobia, that's all. I never said Lauda was trans (I never said Lauda wasn't, either).

Quote from: The Pharmacist on Today at 01:57:11 PM

I'm sure I missed something in the past few days, but how did we get yet another CH alt stirring up drama, and what's the importance of Lauda's gender mystery right now?

Vod was merely trying to decide what pronouns to use to refer to Lauda and c******unter naturally blew it out of proportion, apparently because Vod rejected c******unter's hypothesis that Lauda is "100% male" due to being "rough and ready". (For bonus points, unignore c******unter and read his posts in this thread if you want to know what he suspects of other user's sexual characteristics, including hypothesised penis lengths and degrees of arse hairiness. Undecided

)

AFAIK you brought up transphobia. I see bjr stating that lauda is male. Nothing about transgender.
I do not see that gender identification is relevant. I see this debate tracing back to VOD. If lauda is male but wishes to portray here that he is female that is not an issue.

Carry on presenting evidence. Transgender is not relevant one way or another.