Quote from: The Pharmacist on Today at 04:17:36 PM

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on Today at 03:16:17 PM

This is not a isolated incident. This behavior is rife?

I'd ask you for examples, but I'm pretty sure I already know your agenda here. There's no need to debate generalities like what you described when specific examples with unique circumstances would probably be much more worthy of discussion--however, I'm also fairly sure we've had this and similar discussions many times in the past, and at this point it's getting very old.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 07, 2020, 07:02:01 PM

Will I ever get to retire this picture?

Not as long as OP and his alts keep beating dead horses like this.

Quote from: cabalism13 on Today at 04:04:43 PM

I am guessing that the account is:
-an alt of CH
-an alt of someone who has a grudge on DT

I'm wondering if it's an alt of TECSHARE. Who knows?

I'm confused as to how time is relevant to the discussion

It is quite clear that attempting to cast or portray irrefutable evidence of scamming as either defamation or trolling is scammer shielding or protecting.

This thread you have already the members trying to derail even the topic of discussion. This should not be permitted.

There are numerous examples. The number of times this topic has been avoided does not reduce the validity of the question
Are those seeking to shield or support scammers as bad or perhaps worse than the scammers themselves?

There can be no doubt that to attempt to brand irrefutable evidence of scamming as "trolling or defamation " is scammer shielding and endangering honest members.

I was sure i posted this is meta for a discussion this has no place in reputation as it mentions no individuals.
This is a discussion that has implications for the entire forum.

Hence why i will lock this and repost in meta. If it is moved again then i will open a thread jn meta asking why mods are trying to hide it in reputation without my requesting it to be moved here.

Looks like further scammer shielding.