Quote from: DragonDance on April 09, 2020, 11:14:49 PM

It s no secret that for the biggest part of their modern history the entirety of what is today known as Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, all the formerly Yugoslavian nation fragments, sizable parts of Poland, Austria, Czechia and Slovakia, in summary the whole of Balkans and considerable parts of Eastern Europe were under Turkish rule.

If the Ottoman Sultans did not sabotage their own dynasty through extensive fratricide and the later adapted practice of keeping the heir apparent locked in a cage till coronation, chances are pretty high all these lands would still be under Turkish banners today, we know for a fact that genetically they are more Turkish now than any of the nominal nationalities mentioned above...

OP is delusional (as his friend wolwoo, but I'll come back later to wolwoo). The Turkish rule was applied indeed over many countries but from here to say that the respective nations are genetically more Turkish - that's ridiculous lol. Just a small example about history and Romania, to not talk here the entire Europe history (which is clear that OP has no vague idea about it). Romania is a Latin[/i] country, maybe most close to the ancient Latins compared to other Latin countries. In ancient times, on these lands was a country named Dacia and its citizens were a subdivision (Gets or Dacians) of the Thracians. Dacia was conquered around the year 100 by the Roman Empire and lived hudreds of years under Roman occupation. The Romans settled here and built families with locals and from here comes the reason for being such close to the ancient Latins. Romanian is very similar with Italian, for example; much similar than French vs Italian or Portuguese vs Italian. However, coming back to the subject. Coming closer to year ~1300-1600, many years after Dacia ceased to exist as a country, on these lands appeared three Romanian provinces: Moldavia, Transylvania and Romania (they united much later into a single country, known now as Romania). Since he apparition of the Otoman Empire, the Turks tried to conquer as many lands as possible, including Romania, for taking taxes. But unlike the Romans, which actually settled here and from their mix with the Dacians the Romanians appeared, the Turks were only interested in taxes and to have nations to bow down in front of them.

Thus, there is no genetic interference between Romanians and Turks (excepting, of course, particular situations where a Romanian marries a Turk or vice-versa). So from start, OP is delusional or knows no history. Even of his own nation lol.

Quote from: DragonDance on April 09, 2020, 11:14:49 PM

check some of the purely spiteful ad hominem responses on the 2 threads wolwoo locked today for some blatant evidence of it: a minor sadistic villain from history who was beheaded for impaling civilians being lauded as a national hero by some loser self-declared "romanian"...

Now the second paragraph, the second delusion of OP, still related to history (in part): that minor sadistic villain was actually the Voivod (the prince) of Romania in those times. So he was not a minor figure. About "impaling civilians": he did not impale civilians, but the Turks which were trying to occupy his country. He was defending the civilians, to be more precise. From what you say, the truth is in the exact opposit side (I'll detail more below). Furthermore: "a national hero" - of course, he was a national hero as he defended us in front of the conquering attempts of a foreign nation. By the way: he fought also against corruption, impaling also the local Romanian Boyars (to translate for you - they were sort of local gang leaders, interested also to enslave civilians (peasants) and to collect taxes from them). And about calling me loser: lol.

Quote from: DragonDance on April 09, 2020, 11:14:49 PM

and here psychotic criminal ~lauda expressing desire to kill Turks en masse, the only surprise here is how this account hasn't been banned ages ago)...

As I said above, the truth is in the exact opposite direction from what OP states. Let's see again what LAuda said:

Quote from: Lauda on April 09, 2020, 05:51:17 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on April 09, 2020, 05:49:01 PM

maybe you might want to get us into gas chambers like hitler's
https://www.ushmm.org/

Would be a waste of gas. You are not worth it.

So Lauda actually stated something totally opposite than killing the ~~Turks~~ baboons en masse. She said this should not be done, as it would be a waste for that gas. Lol. So OP either doesn't know English or he speaks the English of a baboon (as Lauda wisely flagged) or he intentionally states the total opposite.

Quote from: nullius on Today at 02:55:36 AM

The mere mention of Vlad Tepes got him #triggered, I see. What was that about “extreme butt-hurt”? Was that a subconscious reference to the direction in which Vlad’s stakes impaled the body? Vlad will teach you the meaning of “extreme butt-hurt”. Shocked

Loooooooooooool. Man I laughed so hard. I truly believe that an extreme butt-hurt was implied during the impaling process. Of course, Vlad Tepes (that was indeed his other nickname as Tepes is a derivate from Teapa, which, in Romanian means wooden spear - you know, that instrument used in the impaling procedure lol) was not actually interested in provoking the butt hurt, rather being interested in putting the Turks to respect for trying to conquer this small country. But one led to the other and that was it lol.

Quote from: DragonDance on April 09, 2020, 11:14:49 PM

and here psychotic criminal ~lauda expressing desire to kill Turks en masse, the only surprise here is how this account hasn't been banned ages ago)...

I literally choked on my coffee laughing when I saw this.[/quote]

+1

Quote from: nullius on Today at 02:55:36 AM

OL. That post made wolwoo a candidate for the Godwin Trophy of the year—and I say that as someone who just last month got into a flamewar with someone who drew an analogy between “Hitler, born in Austria, infected almost the whole of Europe”, and “Tyrol, infecting half of Europe with SARS-CoV-2”, quote-unquote, with blame in both cases on the mentality of Germans and Austrians.

Now finally getting also to wolwoo, which is another delusional person. As far as I saw, periodically (once at 1-2 months) he starts a fight / rant about an absurd allegation, such as: the war with the Dalton Gang, the was with the entire forum, the request to be banned himself, the war against the "racism" practiced by DarkStar_ for not accepting Turks in Chip Mixer Campaign. Now that a Turk was accepted, but excluded afterwards, the most recent war: why was his fellow national excluded, plus the examples given by nullius and so on. Of course, all being absurd accusations. Which is more interesting though (aspect which fully convinced me that he is delusional) is that after he starts the fight, he keeps posting and posting and posting. And after some time, out of nowhere he suddenly ends the entire topic with love-related words. The last example:

He ended to penultimate war with:
"i love forum
I love people
goodbye"

Or: he ended his last war with:
"ok

I don't have any hostility to anyone anyway"

And then he locked the topic lol.

So I think that if someone is angry, be stays angry. But he switches fron anger immediately to love and to peaceful attitudes, which really makes me wonder if he is mentally sane.

Quote from: nullius on Today at 02:55:36 AM

Obviously, “DragonDance” so severely misrepresents historical and current facts throughout his post, it is beneath factually debunking point by point. It is typical of him and his buddies.

I hope the history lesson I just gave will help a bit. Not sure though.

Quote from: iasenko on Today at 07:29:28 AM

Trying to play the history card won't benefit you especially in the forum .

Even more true, as he obviously doesn't know history.

I remember I recently saw a topic here named The war with Russia: can we end it? Do we want to?. I think OP's actions or wolwoo's as well might leads to a similar topic sooner or later, unfortunately, as they attack so many people here.