Quote from: JollyGood on April 10, 2020, 10:51:56 PM

"Misdirection" is a word that comes to mind. There is a certain group full of attention-seeking users that just cannot help themselves but create all sorts of dramas without addressing the core issues. They prefer posting about various non-related things instead of the specific reasons the threads were created for and will ignore any evidence presented just for the sake of their misdirection ploy.

Quote from: nullius on April 10, 2020, 08:25:34 PM

How did a thread about wrongdoing by the self-styled hacker who fails basic coding shibboleths become a discussion of whether JayJuanGee has adequately considered the evils of Lauda and nullius. ← Rhetorical question intentionally concluded with a full stop.

It appears the fake scam hunter jollygood has reared its duplicitous head.

How can providing context for malborozas red trust and your own red trust of hacker0101000101
be misdirection?

Are you claiming punishment of possible ico bumping should just be isolated from all context that you and malboroza set?

As opposed to the derailing of just random false accusations of trolling people spam on my threads?

You and marlboroza have given hacker red tags? I believe you want to prevent any context because it will reveal you are pushing double standards.

I see that people here are classed as on topic discussing whether or not hacker010010 should be added to a persons trust list??
Again to answer that we need context do we not??
I mean i am trying to make sense of what you and others are claiming? Hacker00101 should not be on a trust list for possible ico bumping you say? In the context of you guys including confirmed scammers??

Is this what you are saying yes or no?

Scammers you include
Possible ico bumpers exclude

Scamming you ignore or try to defend
Possible ico bumping you make threads and publicly denigrate?

Just trying to make a summary of the thread so far?