Quote from: nutildah on April 11, 2020, 02:40:36 PM

Quote from: bryceweiner on April 11, 2020, 01:35:36 PM

Done here.

Yes, you are. That's one thing we can both agree on. You got caught plagiarizing a project and trying to pass it off as your own work.

You are done here.

Like you have any ability to say who is "done" anywhere, dummy. You're just a particularly inept little bully with a well justified inferiority complex.

I love how much fail you are full of. Well, that and the other thing you're full of.

You open a fraudulent scam accusation thread and self own so badly that you had to lock the thread to stop faceplanting. Cheesy

You try to claim scam, whatever the hell it is that you think that means, on the basis of "plAgIaRisM"

But by doing this you demonstrate

A) you don't understand how open source software works, so you don't understand that it's legal and ethical to duplicate the software exactly before making changes

B) you don't understand how GitHub works, so you fail to notice over 11,000+ commits with citations giving credit to the Tomochain project and the Ethereum project it is forked from, proving your claim that there is no citation to be extremely false.

And your clueless lackey/sockpuppet "Lauda" then moves the goalposts in a similarly inept or dishonest fashion and not only acts as if I had claimed those 11,000+ commits were Bryce's, but decides that the recent ones aren't good enough to count or some nonsense.

So dumb.

C) you don't understand anything about the process for cloning an existing crypo, which as I had to explain to you begins with duplicating the codebase and making alterations starting with the coin name and symbol.

This naturally would result in things like the description being temporarily identical to the description of the codebase it's derived from, other than the aforementioned currency name and symbol. This, again, invalidates your claim.

The screencap you chose to quote above as if it demonstrated wrongdoing literally says Bryce was only about 30% done with the process, so the fact that trivial details like the description in the readme file being unchanged other than the name and symbol is exactly what a knowledgeable person would expect to be the case.

Yet you're so clueless--or dishonest--that you chose to misrepresent that as "plagiarism" Roll Eyes

D) Your second persona, "Coinclarity" is a fraud since, as has been demonstrated, you don't know a damn thing about how crypto works so you're clearly unqualified to be writing on the topic

E) You have so little basis for your "scam" claim that now you're pathetically dredging up people's opinions of Bryce up from six damn years ago like it says proves anything about the legitimacy of Tao, and now you're pathetically looking at old threads like OSC, desperate to find something, anything to prove yourself right.

F) You lack any integrity since you refuse to admit your plagiarism claim is entirely false and refuse to remove the libelous flags on my account and Bryce's

G) Tao, a cryptocurrency which has been in operation since 2016 and has worked with the law and not against it, is so legit you can't do anything but lie to attempt to discredit it

Thank you for the entertainment. I've had a lot of fun the last few days.