Quote from: marlboroza on April 13, 2020, 02:13:10 PM

Quote from: Lauda on April 13, 2020, 04:24:55 AM

Quote from: marlboroza on April 11, 2020, 12:45:35 PM

May I remind everyone this topic isn't discussion about
1) Lauda
2) Nutildah
3) TECSHARE's trust list
4) JollyGood
5) yobit
6) Insert any other deflection

Moderators are useless. Roll Eyes

And, off topic conversation continues. Just look at this waste of sperm:

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on April 13, 2020, 01:26:56 PM

possible ico bumping

"possible" Huh

1051 characters, I ignored all spam and off topic parts of last post and there is exactly 17 on topic characters. I am not sure from where are all these shitposts and conspiracy theories coming from, but last time I checked, this is what is in topic:

Quote from: marlboroza on December 31, 2019, 03:04:34 PM

What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service?

That is important part. And first reply was:

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on December 31, 2019, 05:45:18 PM

I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.

That is also most important part. Hacker lied several times and denied everything then he was exposed then he confessed. After deeper study of hacker's address, there is unignorable number of transactions going to and from various bump accounts, now some users like TECSHARE and bonesjonesreturns are trying to bury my discovery in the sea of off topic deflective shitposts.

Why is TECSHARE trying to deflect this topic, "ico payed review sevice" is fraud business, there is significant number of users who are fighting against these fraud services and I don't see him doing this in any other topic (this is for example one topic about the same subject https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238597.0, which is, bump service, nah, you won't see tecshare there) Huh

Nobody is burying anything
You say you have proved hacker0101000101 was bumping ico?

What is the point of this thread? If you have proven this to yourself and you already gave him red tag and excluded him?

Which seems strange because you take zero action against proven scammers.

What is this thread for. You want others to ignore scamming or support scammers but red trust members you say you have proven are ico bumpers?

Can i know the purpose of the thread? I thought it was a

Should marlboroza give hacker0101000101 red tags and exclude ...is this a sensible consistent and fair punishment that other should follow thread? If not what is it?

Why are you upset? We are comparing what you claim hacker0101000101 has done to other wrong doing and deciding what to do right?

How is comparing = burying? Are you confused?

I will be ready to talk about hacker0101000101 and compare his alleged ico bumping or any other alleged crimes with you marlboroza. No burying and 100% sensible debate but you want to discuss punishment but you want to bury the context of your prior behaviors so you want only the narrative that suits you not fair assessment.

If this is true put in your thread. I want to unfairly punish hacker0101000101 and be inconsistent. I dont care if i want to support scammers sometimes i just need to on this occasion punish someone no matter how unfair or inconsistent it seems. Please dont mention that and just pretent my narrative is not double standards abuse.

Then we can understand to just all be unfair and inconsistent like you and you will enjoy your thread more??

Is this what you wish? Then please adjust your title and op