Quote from: marlboroza on Today at 11:10:33 AM

Quote from: andulolika on April 15, 2020, 06:14:52 PM

This war between groups that want to control DT

Exposing ICO bump service or how some people call it, spam service, is not "war between groups that want to control DT"! You will never say that all these users are in war https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.0 you are selectively choosing where to post and what to post.

Account TECSHARE should go to that topic and start shilling for other spambies, especially the ones payed to post fake reviews for ICO's, like he is shilling for this fraudulent service for last 4 months.

Quote from: TECSHARE on April 15, 2020, 05:24:22 PM

coordinated
critical
clowns
retribution
abuse
system
punish
disagree
them.

For more details check:

Quote from: marlboroza on April 13, 2020, 03:41:03 PM

PUBLIC WARNING:

Account TECSHARE is shilling hard for fraudulent payed positive ICO reviews and interfering with investigation of such fraudulent service

>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0;all <<<

"ICO bump service" is highly deceptive and malicious service which highly misleads potential investors and leads to money loss

It is beyond my knowledge how this plagiarist, fraudulent bump account and spam service got the second chance.

Quote from: suchmoon on April 15, 2020, 01:03:03 PM

Use "Report to moderator" and report the posts that break the rules. I doubt there was only one plagiarized post.

A wall of text is unlikely to convince moderators to just ban him again for a previously reported issue.

That is correct. I just remembered something

I don't call it a war between groups either. I call it a bunch of clowns trying to punish people for criticizing them. Well, you got me! We both use words. That is all the proof needed by the clown car to determine guilt. Tell me, exactly how am I "interfering"?

Quote from: suchmoon on Today at 02:01:20 PM

I don't think the ban hammer absolves all preceding "sins". E.g. if a solid link can be established between the sockpuppets and it can be shown that he spam-bumped threads with multiple accounts, that should be viewed as a separate issue. However it would likely be a temporary ban anyway so the point of the OP is kinda moot.

They get their retribution for speaking a little too freely, and they get to send a message that anyone who is critical of them pays consequences for their actions. It is not moot at all!