Quote from: JayJuanGee on April 16, 2020, 05:20:29 PM

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on April 16, 2020, 07:20:40 AM

Quote from: coupable on April 14, 2020, 11:26:09 PM

Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.

DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.

It seems to me that questions around DT member activity revolve around what theymos said in this below-attached post regarding his tweaking of the DT1 list criteria on about a monthly basis, which seems to have some activity criteria.. sure it is not "always" active, but requires being on line and posting as I bolded those two lines, below:

Quote from: theymos on January 09, 2019, 06:03:26 PM

............
#3
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
- If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
- You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
- Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
- You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
- You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
- You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.

..........

That's not what I meant. I agree with Theymos' rules, inactive members should be removed from DT1. I meant that DT members are not obliged to stay active, just because they have left negative feedback.

Quote from: coupable on April 16, 2020, 06:43:56 PM

Your opinion is extreme. Feedback with a valid reason can also be revised and changed and even removed.

I didn't say feedback shouldn't be revised. I said it shouldn't be revised that often, which is a big difference.