Quote from: nullius on Today at 07:12:49 PM

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on Today at 06:31:37 PM

This is an argument that hacker0101000101 must have fair and consistent treatment.

[...]

Double standards are the most destructive and dangerous threat to this forum.

And that is why the spammer should never have been granted lenience for plagiarism—and should not be granted lenience for spamming.

Thank you for making my argument for why “hacker1001101001” should be banned.

Having made my point about “bonesjonesreturns”, his obscene rhetoric that no sane person would want to be associated with, and his way of accidentally advancing my argument whilst illogically pretending to do otherwise, I think that I should probably now start taking my own advice.

Code:

+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+-------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
==================================================================

Here we witness nullius running away. Cherry picking and actually removing context to distort what I am saying.
Before self proclaiming his double standards to be fair and credible grounds for punishment it seems.
Avoiding the Full context of perm banning hacker0101000101.
He is running away because he knows I will be calling for a full detailed comparison of his scamming friends irrefutable independently verifiable directly financially dangerous behaviors VS copy and paste and ico bumping. Full context for determining fair and consistent punishment.

Full context. Not just the context you want to allow.

Nullius are you afraid here and now to compare the independently verifiable observable behaviors of your friend lauda the scammer, tman the auction scammer and nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete the evidence when busted.
Who cycle merits, trust includes and red tag whistle blowers who present evidence of their wrong doing.
Who you nullius claim are default trust 1 material worthy of praise. Who you concoct feeble and weak excuses for.
Who you protect and support by going after these scammers critics

To compare them with hacker0101000101s copy and paste and his purported ico bumping.
Who has already been banned. Who is already red tagged. Who has a 2 year sig ban. Who has admitted he done wrong and has not used red tags to try to silence his whistleblowers?

I will add value to hacker0101000101 only because having the courage to stand up to the scammers you are assisting nullius provides extreme value to the forum.

Shall we do a full and deep comparison of these members and see who requires attention first?

Your fake concern for the forums safety is laughable.
You want to kiss up to lauda and try to sound smart so she (he) will cyber sex you. Only verbally though I notice you said

lol no wonder alia cut you off... back to your pillow as alia who knew you best here said lol

Are you ready for a full comparison hacker0101000101 vs lauda nutildah tman ?
Then we perm ban those that place the forum at most danger by keeping the status quo

Amazes me how you believe your pattern of slobbering and excusing scammers you think are female should not be a concern to the forum.

Back to your wank pillow nullius wait for laudas next cyber sex verbal session lol, I bet he's laughing at you . Your double standards and fake concern that drive you to trust abuse and call for bans on those that stand up against your sexy scamming goddess lauda are obvious and transparent..

" I don't have 1.2 btc" what a loser. No wonder you can't pay for cyber sex like all the other more successful old pervs? Strange alia never wondered how such a " genius" is such a loser and cheap skate. Supporting scammers on DT is not the way to satisfaction nullius.

Nullius wants fair to mean we promote scammers to default trust and perm ban those who speak up against them who have some less serious dirt on them for which they have already been punished for.

I mean you can be consistent. You can consistently support scammers you think are female. Does not mean it is fair or is beneficial for the forum.