Quote from: SwC_Poker on April 19, 2020, 09:18:30 PM

Thank you for the feedback. It will be considered as the team crafts the schedule going forward. If you have a favorite tournament that you'd like to see continue or an idea for a new tournament please feel free to share. Not everything will be possible but it will be taken in to consideration.

I know I'm beating a dead horse but there's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't just put it back in right now. I looked back to every Turbo Rebuy 3k I entered to (sample size 10) and it has been very popular: 8/10 times the prize pool was 4500+ chips and only once did it not reach the guaranteed prize pool, at a total buyin of 2800.

So you guys are missing out on the rake it directly makes from the tournament, as well as the indirect rake from encouraging users to stay on Swcpoker - there are no other NLH tournaments at the 10:00 pm GMT timeslot on Wednesday, only an 11-game tournament and a satty. Ask yourself this: what's the main game your player base plays, and who are you prioritising? But you don't even have to choose one over the other because multi-tabling is a thing! Even if there was a special NLH tournament at this time slot, the Turbo Rebuy could and should still go on. They can't "compete" with one another if you're worried about not getting enough entries into special tournaments, since it would only draw in more players. The only exception to this would be if it was an exact copy, with the same blinds and structure but higher buyin (200-250) like I have suggested before you could do on the weekends.

At least today (Tuesday) there was a NLH tournament at 10pm, though it was 100x the buyin of the Turbo Rebuy. How many 100 chip buyin players from the Turbo Rebuy do you think have a large enough bankroll to buy into that?

I don't get it guys, this has got to be one of the easiest business decisions out there.