Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie
Jay, that is an interesting point about self-moderated threads. I myself exclusively start self-moderated threads, in all forums where it is allowed;* I began that habit in Development & Technology, after some anti-Core/anti-Segwit trolls started to follow me obsessively—specifically targeting me. (I wonder why.)
(* Except when after a twenty-month absence, I forgot about the forum bug that loses the self-mod setting on preview. Oops.)
Whereas I am wary of participation in self-mod threads unless I trust the OP’s judgment. Even well-known users can be problematic. Apropos your discussion here, my experience with “bonesjones” has demonstrated to me that he does not moderate fairly, or even with basic civility.
Naturally, I trust my own judgment!
From the only important contribution that the trolls have thus far made to this thread, I have been doing some research of my own...
I googled TPOTO....
I got: The Phantom of the Opera.
...for I don’t follow pop music. (Yes: To me, that is pop music.) I also looked into it; and, lo...
I confess, “bonesjones” doxed me!
“nullius” is Erik, better known as The Phantom. Behold my glory!
Needless to say, I am pleased at the homage to my power and my genius. I will post a new self-moderated thread about this sometime maybe much later, and link to it from here; however, I have no time to finish it now. Busy. —With Christine, my Angel of Music.
Meanwhile, back to the topic:
Ironically, if “hacker1001101001” had come clean three months ago, then my involvement in the case would have been minimal, and only at the periphery. And though I can’t speak for anyone else, you know as well as I do that quite probably, others would have been forgiving if he had just been honest.
Instead, he repeatedly lied. Whenever new evidence has been discovered against him, his story has shifted; meanwhile, he has hurled insults and wild accusations at those who have caught him.
Thanks to marlboroza’s tireless efforts as supported by others (including you), one lie after another has been imploded. Whereas the code-illiterate “hacker” thought that he could more or less get away with it, just as he got off with a relative slap on the wrist for the type of plagiarism for which many others have been permabanned. I lost track of the Reputation thread for almost two months; when I caught up, I was amazed to see that not only was it still going, but “hacker” is ruder and more remorseless than ever!
Enough is enough. May I hereby light up a better way.
Thank you for adequately summarizing this whole thread in two sentences.
(* Except when after a twenty-month absence, I forgot about the forum bug that loses the self-mod setting on preview. Oops.)
Whereas I am wary of participation in self-mod threads unless I trust the OP’s judgment. Even well-known users can be problematic. Apropos your discussion here, my experience with “bonesjones” has demonstrated to me that he does not moderate fairly, or even with basic civility.
Naturally, I trust my own judgment!
From the only important contribution that the trolls have thus far made to this thread, I have been doing some research of my own...
TPOTO... lol
I googled TPOTO....
I got: The Phantom of the Opera.
...for I don’t follow pop music. (Yes: To me, that is pop music.) I also looked into it; and, lo...
Nullius is of course TPOTO.
I confess, “bonesjones” doxed me!
“nullius” is Erik, better known as The Phantom. Behold my glory!
Needless to say, I am pleased at the homage to my power and my genius. I will post a new self-moderated thread about this sometime maybe much later, and link to it from here; however, I have no time to finish it now. Busy. —With Christine, my Angel of Music.
Meanwhile, back to the topic:
Why on earth would hacker1001101001 avoiding answering the questions? Others are trying their best to defend him here and trying hard to deflect and misdirect but it all seems fairly silly to me when all he has to do is to own up to ALL his activities under ALL his alt-accounts.
Ironically, if “hacker1001101001” had come clean three months ago, then my involvement in the case would have been minimal, and only at the periphery. And though I can’t speak for anyone else, you know as well as I do that quite probably, others would have been forgiving if he had just been honest.
Instead, he repeatedly lied. Whenever new evidence has been discovered against him, his story has shifted; meanwhile, he has hurled insults and wild accusations at those who have caught him.
Thanks to marlboroza’s tireless efforts as supported by others (including you), one lie after another has been imploded. Whereas the code-illiterate “hacker” thought that he could more or less get away with it, just as he got off with a relative slap on the wrist for the type of plagiarism for which many others have been permabanned. I lost track of the Reputation thread for almost two months; when I caught up, I was amazed to see that not only was it still going, but “hacker” is ruder and more remorseless than ever!
Enough is enough. May I hereby light up a better way.
Fighting scam but spreading spam? I am not convince that hacker1001101001 deserves to even have a chance to even be here in the forum.
Thank you for adequately summarizing this whole thread in two sentences.