Let's sum up the 2 text walls above

Juanjaygee is making 2 claims

1. That my claim "that full context is fundamental to determining fair and consistent punishment " is bogus

2. He then claims that my statements based on irrefutable independently verifiable of scamming and willing scam facilitating for several members are nothing but the convoluted reasoning of a confused madman. That do not demonstrate any wrongdoing by his pals lauda, tman, nutildah et al. At all.


I ask him to provide specific instances or examples where he can demonstrate  clearly the evidence is weak and he can debunk.

Jayjuangee refuses to back up his statements and provide even 1 example which he can debunk

Why? Because he knows he can not debunk any of it. It is documented independently verifiable evidence of clear scamming by his friends that is way more ruthless and viscous than paid ico bumping.

Take the example I presented above and linked to for him? Totally avoid trying to debunk that or excuse laudas behavior. Why? Because there is no excuse that will stand up to scrutiny.

He then says something even more crazy.

He says well of course a scammer not be treated the same as an honest member as if that somehow debunks my claim that all members must be treated fairly and consistently aka the same. This demonstrates he does not understand the concept even.

Of course a scammer will not be treated the same as honest member.

Let's make this clear. If jayjuangee was confident he could demonstrate lauda nutildah and tman histories were of honest members with no scamming or financially motivated wrongdoing then of course he would not hesitate to debunk my claims that in the full context of their behaviors then hacker can be a higher priority for some " further punishment " assessment.

You only run away from comparisons that will debunk your claims

You don't run away from comparisons that will help debunk your opponents arguments

Lol at these people.

Like if I said to nullius my cock would make alia squeal with pleasure whilst your old micro penis would be laughed at and ridiculed by her.

Nullius says ..in maximis meis coles lilliputian terminorum. Aka my penis is huge in lilliputian terms.

I flop out the 9inch by 7inch girth flaccid snake

Nullius says .. off topic, irrelevant, my trouser zipper has gone mouldy and I cant compare atm.


Scared to compare is usually due to fear. 
Lord byron eat your heart out bozo.

They dont want to compare all of hackers history to the dirt that can be shown to be lurking in the histories of these scumbags.
Want hacker banned? Ban the more dangerous first and their complicit supporters and excusers

How can it be so hard to find a handful of old trusted members with no histories of scamming or willing scam facilitating for pay to put in our trust system .. we are not this desperate are we?

This newbie zoo of DT scammers is an embarrassment.