Quote from: othell_rogue on April 28, 2020, 09:17:33 AM

OK, so you are saying that only 1.5% are bad flips, I doubt that. Half of them are shit flips, I report more than half in the long session, flips with no relation to the words, flips with words or numbers on the images, even in chinese/japanese or korean, flips with the same image start to end.
Maybe my "super-verifiers" idea was not a good one, at least for you, but we need to try something about.

P.S. I don't care about network growth and decentralization if this is done by bots and/or idiots (the one who makes bad flips).

I've calculated it based on 280+ flips that i had during last 13 epoch (long + short)

Quote from: Tytanowy Janusz on April 22, 2020, 06:22:24 PM

Out of 288 flips (long and short) I was only 3.5 p. short from max. How much of this was my fault? Maybe 0 maybe 1,2,3. Based on that i assume that ~1% of flips are flips that was bad and passed.
Last 8 validation i could go to telegram and post "ohh my flips was so great. I get 100%" - but people do not do that. Human nature is crying if something goes wrong.

Please don't be offended but if you don't understand half of flips maybe you are shitty in solving flips not flips are shitty?

You know why "super verifier" is bad idea despite all aspect that I've already discussed? Because people will complain that they get shitty flips during pre-validation session and didn't earn 100 % that was possible or lost "super verifier" status. With ~50 "super verifiers" all of them will have to solve 120 flips and flips will have consensus made out of 1 vote! Few shitty or bored "super verifiers" and network might have syrious problem.