Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on May 06, 2020, 11:59:05 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on May 06, 2020, 09:37:49 AM

Naturally you fit that prerequisite, so you don't see that as being a problem. Roll Eyes

I mean, I've been making these points on multiple occasions long before I was DT1, but whatever fits your narrative. I also don't actually care whether or not I am on DT. I do care about thousands of newbies who don't know any better seeing "trusted" feedback from scammers and people gaming the system for their own benefit.

As Loyce says, my suggestions would decrease the power of DT1 members, not increase it. Why would you take issue with that?

I'm not. That's your narrative. Roll Eyes

What I am concerned about is there is already a growing resentment concerning DT1's who wrecklessly post vitriol all the while earning payments from Signature Campaigns that pay thirty times over their nearest rivals. If the number of DT1's is whittled down (and those same DT1's are still on earning crypto for their quasi hate speech), then can you imagine the heightened level of claims and counter claims concerning their being paid to hate>?

(All the while seemingly picking off anyone they don't like/trust (i.e. Peloso) preventing anyone else from getting into those SigCamp's).