Quote from: marlboroza on May 14, 2020, 07:03:33 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 14, 2020, 06:44:49 PM

blockchain proof

You...you...racist!

Quote from: suchmoon on May 14, 2020, 06:44:49 PM

However it's even less likely that theymos would blacklist the dipshit so there's that too.

I wonder, what's that blacklist button supposed to do, and when? Theymos said this:

Quote from: theymos on January 09, 2019, 06:03:26 PM

However, I reserve the right to remove you and blacklist you from future selection if you engage in egregious and obvious abuse, or if multiple known alt accounts could be selected.

So what is keeping him from using that button, I mean, how many proofs theymos really need to open his eyes?

Yes I agree about the blacklist button requiring work.

1. It only blacklists proven scammers from DT1 and not default trust entirely. This is not effective.
2. It hasn't been used against proven scammers and their supporters and protectors like you. So perhaps you are right he needs to open his eyes.

I mean you requested to be kicked out of DT and yet there you are still there abusing the trust system? Against your will no less lol

Theymos does need to open his eyes and engage in debate publicly regarding scammers.
He tends to just say they seem okay, and vanish before allowing himself to work publicly through the independently verifiable evidence.

Seems other high ranking members have had no issue seeing the evidence and accepting what it demonstrates.

The more people are pushing theymos to be extra attentive to certain members near or on DT they are certainly forcing him to look at all scammy members that are on or nearly on DT1.

1 simple rule for DT1 membership or default trust at all, must be: if there is undeniable evidence of scamming then you must be blacklisted.

That is just fucking obvious. I mean denying this is insanity.
Yes the decentralized experiment may be fun but there should be no proven scammers on DT.

It should be a responsibility of DT1 if they are presented with conclusive evidence of scamming they must create a warning.
We have DT that refuse to act against others that have scammed just because they are on Dt.

We have DT1 defending scammers?

When will it be sorted out?

Be specific if you wish to refute any part of this post.