Quote from: hilariousandco on May 08, 2020, 08:18:22 AM

Some idiot is going on an unnecessary reporting spree. It's mostly pointless reporting the majority of old posts but if someone reports something then some mod will likely handle it. I don't think we should de-facto prohibit people from reporting all old posts but reporting low-quality posts from 5 years ago isn't really needed.

Mr Hilarious has been feuding with Mr Mprep for many many years about his posts been deleted.

Quote

Quote from: mprep on May 03, 2014, 09:10:57 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on May 03, 2014, 09:06:57 AM

Can we get the option of seeing our reports that get marked as bad? I got a bad report yesterday for the first time in a while and I have no idea what it was for. I understand they're kept on the system for two weeks so I think it'd be beneficial if we could see the ones that have been rejected. This way at least people can learn from their mistakes and get a general idea of what should and shouldn't be reported.

I handled a lot of your reports recently. Guess I'm on a similar time line .I marked one as bad since you reported a thread in a Beginners section that actually fit there. That's it, I think.

So hilariousandco has known for at least six years that mprep shows no mercy when deleting posts.

Quote from: malevolent on Today at 05:38:56 AM

Quote from: Vod on May 12, 2020, 04:31:10 AM

I would guess the moderators are reaching for violations years back, because real time violations are decreasing.

Nah, there are actually multiple people reporting some very old posts.

How many votes does it take to delete a reported post? Does anyone check if the admin says "yes" to one report, but "no" to another report (even when they are in essence the same type of report???) and how does mod malevolent know who made report? and how many reports are not looked at?