Quote from: Lauda on Today at 10:55:24 AM

Quote from: Blacknavy on May 15, 2020, 06:49:24 PM

I wrote this (it was deleted by La):

Quote

Zz is a college student, and mhanbostanci is an adult. Both are known by forum members.

I write on one of my accounts that I am Atatürk, and in other alt account I write that I am Nietzsche. They get connected to via wallet evidence using chain analysis tools. Will you say that this is definite proof that the other is not my alt account? You believe every word these two monkeys write and take it as evidence, while doing the opposite with people who you do not like (not even for valid reasons). Stupidity at its finest.

Skipping some minor possibilities is also stupid.

For example; as can be seen below, besides my own investments, I also manage the investments of my brother, mother, aunt and uncle.

26 May 2019 [IMG1]
Blacknavy: Aunt X, if I sell them now it costs 5000 Euros. When the Stex exchange opened for testing, the price jumped up to $0.7 then the trade closed. Token will be on the new exchange soon. If it is $0.2, the market cap is only 13.5 million. Instead of selling, you should stake them.
Aunt: You know. The decision is yours.
Blacknavy: The price may increase when it listed a good exchange. If you want me to sell my uncle's share, I will sell it.

3 April 2019 [IMG2]
Blacknavy: I like Doge. It is raising now, aunt X, please send me a USDT address. Do you have an exchange account that you can buy Doge?
Aunt X: Kraken.
Blacknavy: I'll send you USDT to buy it.
Aunt X: I wrote the USDT address to your Telegram.

If there is a connection between my aunt's USDT address and my USDT address, does that mean that my aunt and I are the same person? It is known to everyone that Bitcoin has grown via word of mouth. Many relatives and friends became members of this forum and invested in Bitcoin as a result of my recommendations [IMG3] [IMG4]. So how right is it to find a connection between the Bitcoin addresses of users we dislike and forget about all their trustworthy backgrounds and fuck them? Who is making up these ridiculous fake-rules? Case1, Case2, Case-million because we created a trust (as Theymos recommend) list and applied for some high-paying signatures? If you have a right to do this, why don't we have a right? This hypocritical behavior was the biggest proof that most default trust members are actually untrustworthy. It is very easy to become a default trust member, only 10 users need to trust someone, and there is no need to do grouping to do this. You just don't want users who do not respect current authority to be default trust member. There is no racism directly against the Turks here, you all have various reason to give distrust/red trust. Some of them are racist attacks (The behavior of many default trust members is embarrassing and humiliating themselves. I'm saying this as national socialist.), and some users trying to save their fake-authority. We don't care whether you or anyone else loves the Turks, but we know that the deliberate defamations against us are also ignored by many default trust members because we created a trust list.