Quote from: Lauda on Today at 01:50:38 PM

Quote from: Blacknavy on Today at 01:43:59 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on Today at 01:39:01 PM

Quote from: Blacknavy on Today at 01:10:00 PM

Blacknavy: I like Doge. It is raising now, aunt X, please send me a USDT address. Do you have an exchange account that you can buy Doge?
Aunt X: Kraken.
Blacknavy: I'll send you USDT to buy it.
Aunt X: I wrote the USDT address to your Telegram.

If there is a connection between my aunt's USDT address and my USDT address, does that mean that my aunt and I are the same person?

I don't know if you're really that dumb or just being deliberately obtuse.

This topic is not merely about a "connection" between two addresses, e.g. funds sent between them like in your little story above. mhanbostanci's addresses are linked as inputs to the same transaction, meaning the same person has control of their private keys. There are some other highly unlikely possibilities but it's safe to ignore them seeing how the only counter-arguments (if you can call them that) so far are focused on the "friends and family" excuse and on dismissing blockchain evidence altogether.

There's someone stupid here, I think it's you who try to twist my messages. Many investments of my relatives are in my hardware wallet (one seed includes milllion addresses in a same wallet as you already know). Have you managed any funds in your life? Do you know what a fund pool means, what does it mean? Or are you only interested in signature campaigns?

If you use the same accounts on the same hardware wallets for many of your relatives then you deserve to be tagged for stupidity sake and to warn others that dealing with you is a risk. Roll Eyes

The same hardware wallet, being used with multiple accounts (1 account 1 relative, as it was designed to be) and used by relatives can never create a transaction like the one that OP and his alt did.

Do you really think you understand wallets better than I do? Facepalm.

If there is 2 UTXO in the same Bitcoin wallet, why not?