Quote from: nutildah on May 20, 2020, 08:38:08 AM

Congrats on this thread being one year old. It sure has been a wild ride.

My guess is that people who unwittingly bought into this scam did a bit of internet research, came across this thread, and are now causing its enablers a lot of problems.

There were problems from the very beginning -- Blue Hill Mining used a plagiarized white paper which is a hallmark of a scam project. Then they employed a bumping service which was exclusively hired by low-quality projects and scams (such as Bitconnect 2). Then the association with Powermine and MLM sleazebag Adrian Jacuzzi came to light. Then the connections with various other MLM scammers.

There were various other red flags so to speak, noticed by the 7th comment on the first page of the thread.

Quote from: tmfp on May 22, 2019, 12:50:18 PM

Quote

The target return of investment is up to 3,340% for the Blue Hill Mining project.

Now the scammers are angrily trying to shift the focus of the thread to running an expose on a law firm that nobody has heard of or cares about. I don't think that helps their image one bit, but then again, the only thing that could at this point would be to walk away from this forum, because I know they are never going to apologize for trying to run a scam here.

This question, asked almost a year ago remains unanswered, yet is still as relevant today as it was then:

Quote from: tmfp on May 29, 2019, 10:41:28 AM

Why should this multi billion blahblah project rely for its promotion on a Portuguese MLM setup with a track record littered with half truths, failure and outright Ponzi scamming?

To begin with, I think the company hasn't said anything here for a long time. Here we are defending something that we have put our money into, and I think that an injustice is being done by accusing something that is not a scam.
It is up to the company to answer that question, and if they have not done so, it is up to them.
Now it turns out that the person who most accuses the company of being a scammer could be a scammer itself.

I have carried out the same modus operandi as that denounced by a European agency, but there are more companies that have denounced in their posts: Apollocurency, of which I will dedicate a couple of posts to it, since it had arrived late to that denunciation. He started in 10th may of 2018 with one post, but it is a great coincidence that shortly before LAWMUC wrote an article about the same thing, and the similarities both in the form of presentation and content are extraordinary. If they seem to be written by the same person.

post

webside lawmuc

If Crypto-info is so expert in uncovering scammers, the strange thing is that it did not investigate its sources a bit, as it says so many times, and then it has been promoting them 23 times in this topic and others in its topic.

I can go on if you want, but I think you understand my point.

Although perhaps you are also involved as the person who has given him more merits, I leave you a screenshot.

I understand he's your apprentice, but be careful, a European agency doesn't make jokes, as free advice.

LAWMUC IS A SCAM JUST LIKE CRYPTO-INFO