Quote from: amishmanish on Today at 04:44:00 AM

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on May 22, 2020, 11:59:27 AM

Considering your trust inclusions list I don't expect TS should take any tips from you.
Stacked full of greedy self serving scammer supporters and scammers.

Let TS consider what he considers. Its your "opinion" that those in my trust list are greedy scammers. Similarly, in my opinion, the people i am asking TS to reconsider are greedy scammers.

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on May 22, 2020, 11:59:27 AM

And how are you getting along with that home work i set you?

Have you finished fully researching the putrid scamming scum yet?

There is not one member I oppose that is not a proven dirt bag.

You are so confident and troll these people incessantly because you seem to have been harmed some way by these people. You hate them personally or something. I don't know. You have been doing this from your CryptoHunter, TOAA days (the resemblance is unmistakable, i must say). I saw that the "extortion scam" that every one loves to talk about was the first one where this whole thing erupted between Lauda and others. TS also did not agree on the way it was settled. There is evidence that it wasn't done for scamming. Infact, the person it was intended for (zeroaxl, right?) himself said that no harm was done. Theymos got involved and lead to Lauda being removed from Mod/ Staff position. Lauda and a few others did over-exert their authority on the forum going so far as trying to be real-world sleuths and catch him for some "actual crimes" they thought he committed (including an exchange hack). This was the general over-zealous stretching of authority by Lauda. And, I agree that Vod also seems to do that quite a bit.

Yet, for someone like me who has only came to the forum in 2017 amid that crazy ICO bubble, I have seen that people like Lauda have been a net positive. I mean there was nobody else banning spammers and scammers so seriously till it became a forum hobby for merit-earning for a lot of people. That is why i trust their judgement. That Darkcoin conspiracy doesn't cut it. From the posts i can see that she said in the beginning that there was no instamine in the sense that "People with Linux could still mine". It ended up that only a few people had that capability at the time so ended up mining most of it. CH was particularly hurt on this because he indeed missed out because he was on Windows maybe.

An instamine would be one that automatically grants the founders lot of initial coins before a miner or any sort of hardware is out. it doesn't seem to be an instamine in that sense. 4 years later, Lauda seems to have changed her mind on a lot of Alts and while Alt-bashing she referred to it as an "Instamine scam". By that time, the ICO scams had all blown up pretty badly and the definitions for a lot of things changed. The hopeful brashness towards alts in 2014 had been replaced by a general consensus that they were mostly scams by devs looking to capitalize and exit scam. In 2014, people on the forum knowing and able to mine would not be called an instamine. By 2017-18, when Lauda made that statement, people had been making up ICO projects only on Telegram and ANN threads and just giving themselves the inital lots. That phrase "Instamine scam" covered a lot of things. The opposition to it not being an "instamine" in 2014 is technical, back when crypto was still mostly technical and had not blown up to the general public yet.

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on May 22, 2020, 11:59:27 AM

Lol at the conspiracy theories.

Stfu debunk the conspiracy or quit your scammer supporting slobbering.

I am not talking about only the conspiracy theories they propagate about DT-1. Yet, from DarkStar_ saying that he did not know of the "trust inclusion" issue, it is clear that him not choosing Turkish posters has nothing to do with DT-1 conspiracy to corner all "juicy campaigns" etc. That is just ridiculous.
You seem to be only interested in the forum drama. I am also interested in Bitcoin. What do YOU make of all that bullshit about BCH, BSV, Blockstream conspiracy that those people are peddling in their threads?? Isn't this forum about bitcoin?? Its not about some scammer alt-coin. Members who aim to be respectable representatives of the community ought not be doing this just for promoting whatever scam-alt they think will give them most returns in the hopes of "flippening" or whatever peddled by Ver, Jihan, faketoshi. Forum drama aside, What is your opinion on that?

Quote from: bonesjonesreturns on May 22, 2020, 11:59:27 AM

A mish mash of weird ideas being splattered everywhere by some newbie who does not know anything of the history of members here or who does but still wants to support scammers.

Take your slobbering elsewhere Roobet.

Mr. Jones, You are one of the few people in this forum who cannot blame anybody for "mish mash of weird ideas" and "slobbering". At least try to appreciate the effort it takes to get through your posts man.

More lies and irrelevant speculation.

Please do the home work again.

Lauda is a proven scammer telling impossible lies.

NOBODY COULD MINE EXCEPT THE DEV TEAM COULD MINE

So lauda claiming and maintaining the claim to dupe investors for months

That he was on the launch so could confirm there was no instamine is an impossible lie.
Totally confirmed by the launch analysis and admitted by the dev team. On release nobody could mine except the developers.
Even if that were not true ( which it was) it could still and would still have been an instamine

He is telling a lie that is impossible.

Now stop telling lies and supporting scammers.

Lol at red tagging some whack a mole shitty 2 bit scammers whilst pushing the biggest scams

Lauda even calls it a premined scam when he has conveniently dumped his bags.

Newbies don't know shit. Amishmash of misleading bogus scammer defending crap.

Lol at selectively busting 2 bit whack a mole scammers while pushing huge scams and extorting people and giving red tags to people for saying they will encourage people to review his history here.
Net positive lol

Anytime supporting scammers directly were I can find documented evidence are going to need be avoided by sponsors
If you want to sponsor members with documented conclusive proof of scamming or direct scammer supporting expect the truth to be exposed regularly. Campaign managers say they want trustworthy members

Well then these campaign managers better do their research.

If you want to sponsor scammers, or direct scammer facilitators and protectors expect the truth to be told