Quote from: CryCrptoCry on Today at 06:06:19 PM

I think that slots are way better than dice because of their payout structure. Lets say you are hunting 99x in dice, in this hunt you will not get paid if you hit 98x. But in slots things are different and you will get paid for every hit though you are aiming for jackpot.
I know that most of the slots pay like 80-92% of what goes into slots but still if you compare it with dice (specially hit and run method) it is more profitable in long run (although in long run you will eventually loose in both games because of house edge)
I want you to ponder upon this and please tell me how much I am right in this line of reasoning.

Dice and slots have different structures so comparing their payout are not appropriate. You basically choose slots because while aiming for the jackpot per round, you also have a chance to win big via multipliers, as per your own view.

Without going too much technical, as I think that's not necessary, if you think that slots are better than dice, then so be it. If you think that slots will give you more profit in the long-run, then so be it. Simple as that.

I don't see any further discussion needed for this. You can consider locking this thread or if there's something that confused you, tell us directly.