Look, if you want to debate a point, that's fine. But can you at least debate against something relevant to my position?
*ugh*
I find it irritating to say the least if me pointing out that the entire foundation for your line of argument is 100.0% false... is regarded as not relevant (?!).
Frankly, that's about as relevant as it can possibly get. That's a point that isn't even debatable anymore to any degree as it's just a complete error in plain sight negating your entire argumentation.
Put in other words : if an entire bulding collapses into itself because its foundation was built on sand and made of grossly inadequate materials - you really don't discuss whether the window dressing in that building was appropriate or not.
I'm not going to debate anything when it's clear you have no idea what I meant in the first place. You don't get to tell me what my position is, that's my job!
Hmkay, so it looks like I scored a direct hit dead-center, sorry to hear that the truth hurts you.
PS.
If that statement of yours that I quoted was
not intended to read what it
clearly read, then you had more than enough time to correct or specify.
Since you didn't, I assume it's exactly what you meant and naturally represents your position. If that for some really wicked reason is not the case, please stop discussing in internet forums for a while and work on your communication skills ASAP (reason : you'd basically be incapable to express your position in writing !? )
