Quote from: CryRen on May 29, 2020, 12:22:05 PM

Before condemning any actions of the project, henceforth we advise you firstly to understand the essence of the issue. We do not hide behind partnerships with anyone, we absolutely do not need this. We have already explained the reason for this in a fairly understandable form.

Wow, calling them out as partners and recommending them as a good service to exchange BTC and alts is a completely different thing, I guess you understand it very well that what you did, had a very thin line in between but it was there. So don't justify your "Partners" play with what you're trying to say. I'm not imagining anything the way you've presented it, if you've not done it, you couldn't be facing this.

Quote

As for transactions, the token really was issued a very long time ago. But we were not in a hurry to launch the project, because we wanted to consider all possible options for the development of the project. We do not want to launch a project without understanding all the aspects and risks associated with the implementation of the project, as we understand all the responsibility assigned to us.

You're speaking here like I've got 0 knowledge about how and when to launch a project. I can take your word, but what about the early or I'd say pre-announcements that should have been made about the then-made project which you're now endorsing about? It doesn't matter how long it takes to launch if you give your investors an idea that the project is still in the making and they'll support you if they see any developments rolling in and here, I'm asking about the pre-launch.