Quote from: PAMPT on June 06, 2020, 01:46:33 PM

Team may stand behind but it doesnt change the fact that Hedera Hashgraph algo u stole from Zilliqua wont cut it. It wont make it unique. It is the year 2020 when more than algo is required to rear a coin into a high-usage grown network. I guarantee that in a month the team will be bent backwards to me as I set up conditions of my involvement into Dumbgion project.

I have been one of the founders of the project and developer. @PAMPT, I am not sure I get your points, and your claims are false.

1. When you write Hedera Hashgraph, we need to distinguish the math proof Hashgraph from Hedera's implementation of Hashgraph, Hedera Hashgraph (which is closed source). We did implement a Tagion Hashgraph algorithm using the Hashgraph math proof, and we have another gossip and sorting mechanism as well. (We had a Tagion Hashgraph test network running december 2018 to summer 2019, where you could see the network live running on 6 nodes.) I can elaborate further on patents if that would be of interest. I don't know the Zilliqua project, but why would you say we have stolen from them? I just checked their repo on GIT, it is written in C++, all our code is written in D Lang and some C lib. More, you can see that we did not do any forks of the https://github.com/Zilliqa/Zilliqa/network/members.

2. I agree you need more than one algorithm to make a viable proposition to challenge the current financial industry's organisation/infrastructure. That is WHY we created Tagion. We have been developing the project for soon 3 years and ready with the full alpha network soon, so I don't think a month would change much for us, why would you think that?