Hi again and thank you for getting back to me.

Quote from: Razick on Today at 02:41:56 AM

Most of those addresses were in an old blockchain wallet that I no longer have. I'll double check later to see if I can provide a signature, but that post IS from before the hack so I'm not sure what the issue is. Unless you believe my account was hacked twice and thus has been accessed by three different people, that post verifies that I am the legitimate owner.

I understand you are just being cautious, but I'm not quite sure why there seems to be some animosity. You can leave the negative trust if you wish. I just thought I'd ask.

I can show you where the animosity is - it is right here in the very next post:

Quote from: guigui371 on Today at 03:36:40 AM

Let me point you to a message signed yesterday from an address that was posted (in 2015) AKA 2 years before the hack (hack= sometimes in 2017).

[u rl= suspicious link removed ]CLICK HERE[/url]

[u rl= suspicious link removed ]AND THEN CLICK HERE[/url]

Quote

You can leave the negative trust if you wish. I just thought I'd ask.

I have not said anything about leaving any kind of trust feedback. You sent me a PM asking me to read this thread (which I have done), I have asked a question and you are endeavouring to answer it which I appreciate you taking your time so that you can answer that question. As to the other recent posters, all I can suggest is that you don't feed the Trolls.