Quote from: alani123 on Today at 02:06:40 AM

The hypothetical scenario is that if we were to run a simulation where no other variables existed, price and fee value would have a perfect correlation.

But unfortunately, you continue preaching for it for a hypothetical scenario claiming it's true.

Quote from: alani123 on Today at 02:06:40 AM

Great example by you here:

Quote from: stompix on May 28, 2020, 11:29:36 AM

Quote

At a hypothetical price of $9.000 per BTC, the cost of the transaction would be $4.3425.

So for 90k$ per BTC we will have 43$ on average.
And for 900k$ we will have 430$ on average.

You're accusing me of trolling but you don't see that wall of sarcasm from one cm.

Quote from: alani123 on Today at 02:06:40 AM

Of course, with real world usage there are many more variables to account for. But there's still a correlation.

Then why are you sticking to the price, when there are obviously others?
Sorry, but in your quest of trying to prove white is wet, you're making a mess of all terms so better avoid them next time.

Quote from: stompix on Today at 12:36:13 AM

Most likely that would also correlate with price also. Makes you think, right?

Nope, it won't.
The proof is that we're at 9700$ with the average fee of 1$ while at the moment you started the topic we were at 9000$ with an average fee of 4$.

I love how you stick to your numbers and your arbitrary line but you REFUSE to comment on the current situation!
Why is this happening and why is your 0.42848 failing for two weeks by now?