Quote from: OgNasty on June 11, 2020, 08:29:57 PM

It was a nice fundraiser. A shame that Vod left me negative trust for putting it on, but trolls gonna troll. I see he has now removed some of his fraudulent ratings against me, but he still has a ways to go. I don't feel like I'm winning a war by refuting Vod's lies with the truth just because his DT strength is in free fall while mine rises. It feels more to me like the community is growing a backbone and slowly steering towards doing the right thing and having a valuable trust network which is a win for us all.

I agree that it's no surprise Vod would leave you another negative rating, no doubt to fulfill their own personal vendetta against you. Also that the DT community does appear to be growing a backbone and is less afraid to speak out against those who are trying manipule the trust system. It's refreshing to see, especially when it upsets these older users who remember the "good old days" of DefautTrust

The days when DT members felt they could silence any criticism of their actions and were untouchable, facilitating power to corrupt in the most predictable ways. RIP Lauda.

Quote from: OgNasty on June 11, 2020, 08:29:57 PM

Quote from: dragonvslinux on June 09, 2020, 09:52:00 AM

I'm glad to see you aren't suggesting others copy & paste that list of users who trust Vod into their trust list anymore, but instead suggesting users add ~Vod to their trust lists instead (for good reason). I also noticed that Vod has since removed that negative feedback left against you, for good reason it seems.

I've since removed my neutral feedback criticizing your trust-based cult, since you no longer appear to be promoting one. This makes me happy

Take care. Nice fundraiser anyway and best of luck winning the war.

A shame that you were so threatened by me posting publicly available information. I see you have removed one of your bogus trust ratings against me. When you realize your mistake and apologize as well as remove your retaliatory feedback which ironically accuses me of being retaliatory maybe we can move forward with a healthy relationship.

Because of these positive developments, I don't feel threatened or intimidated by DT members anymore. I removed my neutral rating for the exact reason that you quoted:

Quote from: dragonvslinux on June 09, 2020, 09:52:00 AM

I've since removed my neutral feedback criticizing your trust-based cult, since you no longer appear to be promoting one.

Believe it or not, I care more about my reputation here of someone who isn't afraid to call someone out on there bullshit using well referenced neutral feedback appropriately and accurately, than I care about your retaliatory negative feedback, or the feedback of other disgraced users for that matter. I've therefore amended my feedback, in order to remain accurate and to avoid any confusion. Additionally referencing the fact you suggested having a healthy relationship with someone you consider a known scammer:

Quote from: neutral feedback

Reference. Gave retaliatory negative feedback (without references) for criticizing his attempts of establishing a cult like trust list, as referenced. In case there is any doubt, see reference of previous neutral feedback (msg54063055#msg54063055) that has since been removed, as this user is no longer advocating others copy & paste his trust list to target a specific user. Claims I'm a "known scammer" and suggested moving forward with a "healthy relationship" (msg54603098#msg54603098). Proceed with caution.

Reference #1:

Quote from: LoyceV on March 20, 2020, 10:54:33 AM

OgNasty used the same Reference as Lauda did 5 months ago. That's disappointing, the topic has 120 pages and 2383 posts by now.
If you call someone a "Known scammer", please use a reference link that points directly to the evidence. You can't expect people to review half a book first.

Now it looks like retaliation indeed.

Reference #2:

Quote from: dragonvslinux on March 20, 2020, 09:56:12 AM

Or just neg me in retaliation for my accurate neutral trust left against you (as someone who previously trusted your judgement) Roll Eyes

Quote from: Neutral Trust

OgNasty 2020-03-19 Reference OG published his trust list in a manner to "easily be copied/pasted into your trust settings" in order to target a specific user, instead of doing so in an appropriate thread (5096204.0) in a respectable manner. I strongly advise against doing this, see topic: 5102296.0. I still trust this user's judgement for now, but his "cultish" trust-based behavior raises serious questions. Doesn't appear to understand the problem with this either, despite those who trust him raising such concerns.

I'm glad you did that, you confirmed the doubts I had about your judgement. You don't intimate me OG, despite your pathetic threats via PM. ~OgNasty
You're welcome to go the way of Lauda and Mosprognoz, I encourage it even, as people don't agree with that opinion.

Archived: 1, 2.