Quote from: Chris Sokolowski on Today at 12:29:47 PM

The scrypt blocks are returning an error about an "EIASAddress," ...

We will look into this. Thanks for pointing it out.

Quote from: Chris Sokolowski on Today at 12:29:47 PM

I looked into this and it was decided to discontinue the coin due to low-quality daemon software.

Oh dear, I am sorry - you got hit by some really bad karma: It was the shitty hash-alllocation scheme of prohashing which forced us to completely change
the mining setup in SmileyCoin in the first place.

It has worked wonderfully until now. Did you check out whether this is the same issue? https://github.com/tutor-web/smileyCoin/issues/23

Quote from: Chris Sokolowski on Today at 12:29:47 PM

This lack of testing on the part of the developers is unacceptable. Real people's livelihoods are at stake here, and that was someone's salary for the day.

I can assure you that the problems with the prohashing hash-alllocation scheme cost us much, much more than a day's work!

But yeah, AFAIK there is only one SMLY mining pool at the moment and any pool owner trying to set up a SMLY pool may indeed find first-time bugs.

The SMLY team has never said that SMLY will work with your pool and we certainly do not accept responsibility for issues which may come up when someone tries to set it up with a new pool.

Quote from: Chris Sokolowski on Today at 12:29:47 PM

... and the daemon wasted over $100.

As noted in the previous post, the prohashing profit calculations for SMLY are at least a factor of 10 off. Did you take that into account?

$100 will buy some 3 million SMLY, which is the mining reward for every single block for 7 days of mining. Your claim just does not sound right.