Not that it's getting too boring.. 4D chess again
Does playing 4D chess require lying, defrauding, swindling, doctoring documents, and impostoring? Because he's losing, and no one is playing his game.
obviously he is playing against himself. thats why he thinks he can win. as he is a half wit, one half
will win.. right?
4D chess FTW
Technically speaking, all games of chess are 4D chess. The chessboard and its pieces are 3D.
see? thats why i could never rise to the csw levels of.. whatever it is. i miss such obvious things.
*sigh*
Technically speaking, he’s playing poker with everyone. He actually tweeted a steganographic message about it ~3 years ago. Anybody know what cards he’s holding or is this the amateur table?

Most of us don't play with known frauds/scammers, and it took about 5 minutes (or maybe less) for many of us to hear him first speak to realize that he was a fraud/scammer/narcisist.
His subsequent actions have largely just confirmed the initial impressions, so probably anyone at the table would merely be bag holders of one sort or another filled with hopium and believing in matters that are contrary to the facts.
So you’re telling me the groupthinkers outdid the real thinkers? Would be the first time in history. Hey, don’t forget to wear your mask in dead heat of summer. The TV says there’s a pandemic.

I am not saying that because if you want to show that there are some folks here in the forum engaging in group think because they tend to be skeptical of shitcoins or various attacks on bitcon such as bcash forks, then you have the burden to show such proof of group think... sure go ahead with your proof.. it is likely to come off as a bunch of gibberish, but I am not going to accept your nonsensical conclusory assertion that there is group think going on without some kind of meaningful evidence (which would be a need for both facts and logic... good luck with that).
The face mask situation and various precautions against a virus remains a bit more of a complicated question, and seems to be a far from adequate attempt at an analogical way of arguing your nonsensical points to the extent that you have any points. Is that what you were trying to do, an analogical argument? lame at best, right?
Hard to explain, especially with NDAs, but basically I’m saying I’m high caliber.
You, Vlad2Vlad, trying to present yourself as if you have some kind of insider, secret, non-disclosable information... hahahaha.. nonsensical approaches that a lot of scammers employ.. and has not worked out too well for craigie.

If you are claiming to be associated with BSV, Craig, Calvin, or you have some kind of NDA (Non-disclosure agreement) to carrying out agendas related to those fucktwats, then you would not likely be considered to fall into any kind of bitcoin "high caliber" status.
Sure, I will concede that there are likely businesses that are built on and around bitcoin that do legitimately employ NDAs in relation to some of their products or approaches to business, so not all NDAs are scammy in and of themselves, but any NDA associated with BSV, craig or calvin would likely be presumed to be anything other than "high caliber" since those diptwats have even been engaging in tactics that seem to be hostile to open source culture (and of course bitcoin), claiming property rights, filing something similar to SLAPP (strategic lawsuits against participation) lawsuits to attempt to threaten and quell speech, open ideas or people who truthfully proclaim them as fraudster/scammers.. and since craigie, calvin and their agents behind the scenes seem to be so fucking incompetent, they have NOT been very successful in their multi-faceted approaches to abuse systems, mislead, scamming and threatening people, even though some of their bag holding followers seem to appreciate their attempts to pumpen the quasi-incompetent (can't hardly get listed on any legitimate exchange) BSV attack-vector product
(which product also has a potential side-benefit of allowing for a possible exit scam for craigie and calvinie if they were able to get a hardfork to forken over the possession of all of satoshi's coins, and any other unmoved coins, and even the dumbass BSV users (bagholders) seem to be not so dumb to fall for that extreme scammy ploy).
I have no NDAs with Craig, Russ or BSV. I honestly think people are following the crowd and not thinking on their own and looking at the tech and the progress made by Craig.